UL (Universal Life)
vs "buy Term and invest the difference"
In
the mid 20th century, a number of life insurance companies used some
aggressive sales tactics to persuade people to buy Term Life. Term
Life is, without question, the cheapest life insurance you can buy.
That's because you are paying only the cost of insurance plus annual
fees. Your insurance premium is based on the cost of insuring you
today.
The company is betting that you won't die within the time period,
so even though the entire face value is at risk (at least for the
first few years), the entire premium will ultimately be profit for
them. At the end of the term, you will either cancel the insurance,
or convert it to some other form of term insurance, either annually
renewable, or decreasing term. Thus, in 20 years, your new premium
will be based on your age at that time, and will go up sharply.
Furthermore, while some companies offer the option of converting
a Term to Whole Life, most limit your choices to simply another
type of Term. The odds are all on their side.
Why did they do this?
The rationale used to get people to buy cheap Term insurance was
to "buy Term and invest the difference." In the mid to
late 20th century, the stock market was booming, interest on savings
was as high as 11 to 14% in some places, and various mutual funds
appeared to have no ceiling. Thus, agents reasoned (under instruction
from their companies), instead of spending all that money on Whole
Life in hopes of having a cash value that could be used later as
an investment, a client could buy the cheapest insurance possible,
protect home and family for 20 years, and simultaneously invest
the money that would have been spent on more expensive life insurance.
By the time the life insurance expired, the investment, at compounded
interest, would be enormous, giving a person both a retirement fund
and enough money for final expenses.
Why didn't it work?
The logic of the Term soliciting made sense. The problem was, very
few people ever invested the difference. Some companies preyed on
low income families who had no clue about investing while others
simply left it up to the client to figure out what the "difference"
actually was and where to invest it. If a company had nothing but
Term to offer (which is all some had) they had no reliable way of
comparing Term to Whole Life; who would know how much to "invest."
Furthermore, many clients—feeling the financial crunch of
raising large baby-boomer families—were concerned only about
having life insurance in the event of an emergency. They trusted
to retirement pensions for money in their senior years, and took
advantage of cheap insurance to keep more money in their pockets.
Knowing they should invest some of that money, many put off doing
so, thinking they would have more money when the kids were through
college, or when the house was paid off. It didn't work like that,
of course, and today, an alarming percentage of people about to
retire are discovering the Term insurance they took out 20 years
ago is going to be impossible to maintain. Additionally, many who
believed they had life insurance "on the job" are discovering that
the employers control the policies—meaning a person's insurance
can entirely disappear once they retire.

AccuLifeInsurance.com
Quotes From Top Rated Insurance Companies
|
| |
|
Copyright
© 2000 -
- www.AccuLifeInsurance.com - All Rights Reserved
|
|
|